USA Ex Rel. Wilson, et al v. Graham Co Soil & Wat, et al
Case Number: 2:2001cv00019
Filed: January 25, 2001
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Bryson City Office
Presiding Judge: Lacy Thornburg
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 437 ORDER granting Relator Wilson's 434 Motion for Attorney's Fees and Nontaxable Litigation Expenses against Deft William Timpson, and denying Deft William Timpson's pro se 436 Motion for Hearing on th e default judgment entered against him. FURTHER ORDERED that the Relator, on behalf of the United States, shall have and recover of Deft Timpson attorney's fees in the amount of $12,558.00 and nontaxable litigation expenses in the amount of $484.22. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 7/8/16. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(ejb)
March 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 433 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 3/9/2016. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(khm)
April 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 367 ORDER discharging 363 Order to Show Cause. It is further ordered that attorney Zeyland G. McKinney, Jr. shall pay the administrative fine for $200.00 dollars within 30 days of entry of this order. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 4/17/2015. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(nv)
April 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 364 ORDER denying 361 Request for Leave to Redepose Defendant Billy Brown. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 04/08/2015. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(klb)
October 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 354 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 10/1/13. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns.(Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(nll)
January 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 338 ORDER amending Pretrial and Case Management Order re issue of further presentation of evidence in this case pertaining to issue of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 1/27/12. (see Order for details) (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(ejb)
December 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 336 ORDER on or before 15 days from entry of this Order, Roy Patton, Esq. shall file a motion for leave to withdraw as counsel in this case. Failure to do so will result in issuance of Order to Show Cause why Roy Patton, Esq. should not be sanctioned. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 12/16/11. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(ejb)
October 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 333 CORRECTIVE ORDER re 332 Order, Set Hearings that the Court's Order of October 19, 2011, is corrected to set the status conference in this matter for December 7, 2011. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 10/25/2011. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(pdf)
October 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 332 ORDER parties shall appear at a status conference in this matter on 12/6/11, in Bryson City. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 10/19/11. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(ejb)
October 7, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 328 ORDER granting 327 Joint Motion to Stay action. Signed by District Judge Lacy Thornburg on 10/6/08. (ejb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: USA Ex Rel. Wilson, et al v. Graham Co Soil & Wat, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?