Fagan et al v Unitrin Auto and Home Ins Co
Paul Fagan and Evelyn Fagan |
Unitrin Auto and Home Insurance Company |
2:2008cv00029 |
October 14, 2008 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Insurance Office |
Jackson |
Dennis Howell |
Lacy Thornburg |
Both |
Diversity |
Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 ORDER that upon suggestion of settlement, that the parties file the Rule 41 Voluntary Dismissal of All Claims With Prejudice, signed by counsel for all parties, not later than November 30, 2009. Respective counsel are advised that they are not presently on a trial calendar as the ECF notification they received October 6, 2009, was only a modification resetting the ready date for trial based on a change in the presiding judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on October 7, 2009. (jhg) |
Filing 18 ORDER granting 17 Motion to Stay the Initial Attorney Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on December 8, 2008. (jhg) |
Filing 16 ORDER STRIKING re 12 Miscellaneous Filing filed by Unitrin Auto and Home Insurance Company. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 12/8/08. (jhg) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting 5 Motion to Dismiss Count One with prejudice, & STAY previously entered as to the IAC & CIAC is LIFTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 11/12/08. (ejb) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 7 Motion to Stay Initial Attorney Conference and Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 11/6/08. (ejb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.