Acebal v. Carolina Homes by Design, Inc.
Plaintiff: Joseph Acebal
Defendant: Carolina Homes by Design, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2009cv00048
Filed: September 1, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Bryson City Office
County: Macon
Presiding Judge: Dennis Howell
Presiding Judge: Martin Reidinger
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER that docket entry #9 is STRICKEN as improvidently filed re 9 Certification of Initial Attorneys Conference and Discovery Plan. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 9/28/09. (pdf)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Acebal v. Carolina Homes by Design, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Acebal
Represented By: Leslie S. Bowers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolina Homes by Design, Inc.
Represented By: Matthew W. Kitchens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?