Hopper v. USA
Gerald Damone Hopper |
USA |
3:1996cv00217 |
June 5, 1996 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Charlotte Office |
Mecklenburg |
Max O. Cogburn |
Motions to Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 62 ORDER denying motions #202 and #203 in criminal case 3:95-cr-119 and advising Petitioner that he must first petition the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for certification of any successive habeas corpus application. The court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 9/6/11. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(gpb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hopper v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: USA | |
Represented By: | Robert J. Conrad AUSA, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Gerald Damone Hopper | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.