USA v. Bowens
| USA |
| Samuel Bowens |
| 3:1997cv00135 |
| March 31, 1997 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| Gaston |
| David Keesler |
| Recovery of Defaulted Student Loans (Excl. Veterans) |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1080 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER granting 15 Motion to Dismiss Writ of Garnishment against Samuel Bowens. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 9/14/10. (gpb)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER granting 10 Motion for Writ of Garnishment, Writ issued to City of Charlotte as to Samuel Bowens. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 9/3/10. (gpb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: USA v. Bowens | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: USA | |
| Represented By: | James Michael Sullivan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Samuel Bowens | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
