Nicholas DiBruno, et al.
Case Number: 3:2005cv00391
Filed: September 13, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Charlotte Office
Presiding Judge: Graham Mullen
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Withdrawl
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 31, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 231 ORDER approving final report and accounting of trustee, granting requests and applications of trustee and his professionals, and authorizing disbursement of funds of the estate re 227 Miscellaneous Filing,. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 12/31/2008. (klg)
September 21, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER referring additional portion of cases to Bankruptcy Court. Signed by Judge Graham Mullen on 9/21/05. (Huntley, Cynthia)
September 20, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Order granting PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. Signed by Judge Graham Mullen on 9/20/05. (Huntley, Cynthia)
September 14, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 8 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAWin suppt of Order granting inspection. Signed by Judge Graham Mullen on 9/14/05. (Wallace, Betsy)
September 13, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting 4 Motion permit inspection . Signed by Judge Graham Mullen on 9/13/05. (Wallace, Betsy)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nicholas DiBruno, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?