Evans v. Retirement Plan for Hourly Employees Represented by Union of Needletrades, Industrial and Textile Employees, A.F.L., C.L.C., Local 630
| Carolyn Evans |
| Retirement Plan for Hourly Employees Represented by Union of Needletrades, Industrial and Textile Employees, A.F.L., C.L.C., Local 630 |
| 3:2007cv00199 |
| May 11, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| Mecklenburg |
| David Keesler |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A. |
| None |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Evans v. Retirement Plan for Hourly Employees Represented by Union of Needletrades, Industrial and Textile Employees, A.F.L., C.L.C., Local 630 | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carolyn Evans | |
| Represented By: | J. Lynn Bishop |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Retirement Plan for Hourly Employees Represented by Union of Needletrades, Industrial and Textile Employees, A.F.L., C.L.C., Local 630 | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
