Hubbard et al v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department et al
| Marc Hubbard and Sports Dimensions Inc. |
| Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department, City of Charlotte, Mike Barron, Terry Mack, Mike Smathers and Eddie Levins |
| 3:2007cv00485 |
| November 16, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| Mecklenburg |
| Graham Mullen |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 cv Notice of Removal - Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
ORDER granting 37 and 38 Motions for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff's claims arising under 42 USC 1983 (Counts 1 and 2). Plaintiff's claims under state law (Counts 3,4,5,6 and 7) are dismissed without prejudice and REMANDED to Mecklenburg County Superior Court. Defendant's request for attorney's fees is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 10/5/10. (gpb)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER denying, without prejudice to refiling on or before 4/30/10, 22 Motion for Summary Judgment and 23 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 3/29/10. (gpb)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER ( Jury Trial rescheduled for 5/10/2010 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge David Keesler.). Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 1/11/10. (bsw)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER, ( Jury Trial set for 2/16/2010 09:30 AM in Courtroom, 401 W Trade St, Charlotte, NC 28202 before Magistrate Judge David Keesler.). Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 9/23/2009. (tmg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
