United States of America v. $8335.00 in United States currency

Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $8335.00 in United States currency
Case Number: 3:2008cv00331
Filed: July 15, 2008
Court: North Carolina Western District Court
Office: Drug Related Seizure of Property Office
County: Alexander
Referring Judge: David Keesler
Presiding Judge: Martin Reidinger
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Jury Demanded By: 21:0881 Property Forfeiture

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 21, 2008 7 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 5 Motion for Entry of Default (apb)
January 21, 2009 9 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 6 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 1/21/09. (dtr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. $8335.00 in United States currency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: William A. Brafford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: $8335.00 in United States currency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.