Duff v. USA
| Cornelius Tyrone Duff |
| USA |
| 3:2008cv00335 |
| July 8, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence Office |
| Gaston |
| Frank D. Whitney |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 28:2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
ORDER directing clerk to close the civil proceeding under docket 3:08cv335 due to withdrawal of 2255 motion filed on 8/4/08. Further denying motion to amend 2255 motion [Document 3], denial is w/o prejudice to refile under 18 USC 3582 within the related criminal proceeding 3:06cr391 Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 7/27/09. (bsw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Duff v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Cornelius Tyrone Duff | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
