Smith v. Medda
Kevin Michael Smith |
Patriba Chittra Medda |
3:2008cv00427 |
September 16, 2008 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Civil Rights: Other Office |
Mecklenburg |
David Keesler |
Martin Reidinger |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ORDER denying 17 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 3/23/09. (dtr) |
Filing 16 ORDER denying 4 Motion for Injunctory Relief with Service. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 3/3/2009. (klg) |
Filing 13 ORDER granting 6 Motion to Substitute Party. United States added. Patriba Chittra Medda terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 1/13/2009. (klg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Smith v. Medda | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kevin Michael Smith | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Patriba Chittra Medda | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.