Olsen v. Ipex, Inc. et al
| Thomas Olsen |
| Ipex, Inc. and Ipex USA, LLC |
| 3:2008cv00480 |
| October 20, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Contract Product Liability Office |
| Alexander |
| Carl Horn |
| Frank D. Whitney |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER granting 21 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Brendan Thompson for Thomas Olsen. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 2/11/09. (dtr)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER granting 18 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Michael Andrew McShane for Thomas Olsen. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 2/6/09. (dtr)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER, ( Initial Pretrial Conference set for 3/10/2009 02:30 PM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge Carl Horn III.). Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl Horn, III on 2/5/09. (dtr)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER granting 13 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Russell Lewis for Ipex, Inc. and Ipex USA, LLC, granting 14 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Richard L. Josephson for Ipex, Inc. and Ipex USA, LLC,. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 2/3/09. (dtr)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER granting 4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice, granting {5} Motion for leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice, granting {6} Motion for leave to appear Pro Hac Vice, granting {7} Motion for leave to appear Pro Hac Vice. (dtr) Modified on 10/24/2008 to add text(dtr).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
