Olympus Managed Health Care, Inc. et al v. American Housecall Physicians, Inc. et al
Olympus Managed Health Care, Inc. and Olympus Healthcare Solutions, Inc. |
American Housecall Physicians, Inc. and Jonathan McGuire |
3:2008cv00532 |
November 24, 2008 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Contract: Other Office |
Mecklenburg |
Robert J. Conrad |
Carl Horn |
Defendant |
Diversity |
Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 123 ORDER: Pretrial duties and filing deadlines as set forth in Scheduling Order (see Doc. 43); Motions in Limine due by 4/23/2012; Mediation deadline set for 3/13/2012; Jury Trial set for 4/30/2012 09:30 AM in Courtroom 2, 401 W Trade St, Charlotte, NC 28202 before Chief Judge Robert J. Conrad Jr. Signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 2/28/2012. (tmg) |
Filing 122 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 106 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 108 Motion for Summary Judgment (judgment shall not issue as this time); granting in part and denying in part 109 Motion for Summary Judgment; and denying 110 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 2/21/12. (com) |
Filing 121 ORDER that Counsel's pretrial duties and filing deadlines are now due on the later in time of either seven (7) days after the date the Court enters an Order on the parties summary judgment motions or upon the date originally required by the Courts Scheduling Order. Signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 2/9/2012. (tmg) |
Filing 105 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 101 Motion to Compel as set forth in Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 11/28/2011. (tmg) |
Filing 94 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 79 Motion for Reconsideration; motion granted as to request for McGuire's costs, plaintiffs to pay costs incurred in defending this action, denied in all other respects. Signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 6/1/2011. (bsw) |
Filing 90 ORDER granting 76 Motion to Compel. Defendant/3d Pty Plaintiff American Housecall to respond to discovery within 15 days of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 5/10/2011. (bsw) |
Filing 60 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 54 Motion to Compel; granting 58 Motion for Leave to File Surreply. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 12/10/2010. (tmg) |
Filing 51 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 9/2/2010. (cw) |
Filing 49 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 45 Motion to Compel Answer's to Discovery. Plaintiffs are ORDERED to serve complete responses to Defendants First Set of Interrogatories and First Request for Production of Documents on or before August 25, 2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 8/10/2010. (cw) |
Filing 44 ORDER amending 43 Scheduling Order to set deadline for completion of fact discovery as 9/1/2010. Signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 3/18/10. (bsw) |
Filing 39 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 22 Motion to Dismiss; adopting 36 Memorandum and Recommendations.. Signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 9/30/2009. (tmg) |
Filing 27 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Order. Signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 2/3/09. (dtr) |
Filing 26 ORDER granting 25 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added A. Christopher Young for Ronald A Davis and Steven W Jacobson, Matthew R. Williams for Ronald A Davis and Steven W Jacobson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl Horn, III on 1/20/09. (dtr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.