King v. United Way of Central Carolinas, Incorporated et al
Plaintiff: Gloria Pace King
Defendant: United Way of Central Carolinas, Incorporated, United Way of Central Carolinas, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, Plan Administrator of the United Way of Central Carolinas, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, Edward L. Curran, Graham W. Denton, Carlos Evans, Anthony Fox, Paul S. Franz and Jeffrey Kane
Case Number: 3:2009cv00164
Filed: April 17, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Mecklenburg
Presiding Judge: David S. Cayer
Presiding Judge: Martin Reidinger
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1981 Job Discrimination (Race)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 88 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 80 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 9/15/2010. (tmg)
May 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 24 Motion to Dismiss; adopting in part 48 Memorandum and Recommendations; granting 51 Motion to Amend Complaint. Plaintiff shall file her Amended and Supplemented Complaint within (21) days of entry of this Order. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 5/14/10. (gpb)
August 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 48 MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending granting 24 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Carlos Evans, United Way of Central Carolinas, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, Anthony Fox, United Way of Central Carolinas, Inc orporated, Jeffrey Kane, Plan Administrator of the United Way of Central Carolinas, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, Edward L. Curran, Graham W. Denton, Paul S. Franz ( Objections to M&R due by 8/24/2009), ORDER that Plaintiff is granted leave to amend Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 8/6/2009. (tmg)
August 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 47 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER adopting 36 Memorandum and Recommendations.; denying 7 Motion to Remand to State Court. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 8/5/2009. (tmg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: King v. United Way of Central Carolinas, Incorporated et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gloria Pace King
Represented By: William K. Diehl, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Way of Central Carolinas, Incorporated
Represented By: Russell F Sizemore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Way of Central Carolinas, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
Represented By: Russell F Sizemore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Plan Administrator of the United Way of Central Carolinas, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
Represented By: Russell F Sizemore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edward L. Curran
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Graham W. Denton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carlos Evans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anthony Fox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paul S. Franz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeffrey Kane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?