White v. Smereka et al
Victor B. White |
FNU Smereka, FNU Taylor, FNU Moss, FNU Sergeant, FNU Smith, FNU Paulk, FNU Childs, FNU Timmer and City of Charlotte, NC |
3:2009cv00257 |
June 29, 2009 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Charlotte Office |
Mecklenburg |
David Keesler |
Frank D. Whitney |
Plaintiff |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 83 ORDER denying 81 Motion for Reconsideration ("Bringing It Again- Doc. No. 79 For Correction of Errors/Affidavit"). Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 8/23/11. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(gpb) |
Filing 76 ORDER denying 74 Motion for Transcript at Government Expense. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 11/29/10. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(gpb) |
Filing 69 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated August 17, 2010. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(gpb) |
Filing 67 ORDER denying 65 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 6/29/10. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(gpb) |
Filing 63 ORDER denying as moot 28 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 40 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 47 Defendant Smereka's Motion to Dismiss ; granting 50 Defendant City of Charlotte's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 6/14/10. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(gpb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.