Harty v. Centro Bradley SPE 7, LLC
Plaintiff: Owen Harty
Defendant: Centro Bradley SPE 7, LLC
Case Number: 3:2009cv00317
Filed: July 29, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Charlotte Office
County: Mecklenburg
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge: David Keesler
Presiding Judge: Frank D. Whitney
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disability Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting 6 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice, added Jack C. Hsu for Centro Bradley SPE 7, LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 8/20/09. (gpb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harty v. Centro Bradley SPE 7, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Owen Harty
Represented By: Jacqueline Yvonne London
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Centro Bradley SPE 7, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?