PRESSLEY v. CAROMONT HEALTH, INC. et al
LAVON S. PRESSLEY |
CAROMONT HEALTH, INC., CAROMONT HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. and Gaston Memorial Hospital, Incorporated |
3:2009cv00460 |
October 27, 2009 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Charlotte Office |
Gaston |
David S. Cayer |
Frank D. Whitney |
Defendant |
29 U.S.C. ยง 623 Job Discrimination (Age) |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 71 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated November 3, 2010. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (tmg) |
Filing 68 ORDER denying 33 Motion for Sanctions; denying 67 Motion for Preliminary Pretrail Conference Hearing. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 10/13/2010. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (tmg) |
Filing 42 ORDER converting 36 MOTION to Dismiss and for Judgment on the Pleadings to a consolidated Motion for Summary Judgment with 38 MOTION for Summary Judgment. (Response to Defendants' Motions 36 , 38 , 39 due by 5/25/2010.) Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 4/30/10. (gpb) |
Filing 28 ORDER denying 27 Motion to Deny the Defendant's designated Expert Witness Nicole Wolfe, MD. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 3/22/2010. (tmg) |
Filing 25 ORDER granting 24 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 3/2/10. (com) |
Filing 21 ORDER denying 5 Motion to Dismiss; denying 13 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 12/29/09. (gpb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.