Floyd v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff:
Billy D. Floyd
Defendant:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Case Number:
3:2010cv00066
Filed:
February 22, 2010
Court:
North Carolina Western District Court
Office:
Charlotte Office
County:
Union
Referring Judge:
David S. Cayer
Presiding Judge:
Frank D. Whitney
Nature of Suit:
Taxes
Cause of Action:
28:1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By:
None
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
October 5, 2010 | 17 |
![]() |
July 14, 2010 | 12 |
![]() |
June 14, 2010 | 7 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Floyd v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Billy D. Floyd | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.