Reid-Lamb v. Time Warner Entertainment Company, Limited Partnership
Plaintiff: Anne E. Reid-Lamb
Defendant: Time Warner Entertainment Company, Limited Partnership
Case Number: 3:2010cv00077
Filed: February 26, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Charlotte Office
County: Mecklenburg
Presiding Judge: David Keesler
Presiding Judge: Frank D. Whitney
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER granting 56 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Joseph W. Ozmer, II for Time Warner Entertainment Company, Limited Partnership. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 6/22/11. (gpb)
May 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 37 Motion for Summary Judgment and 39 Motion for Summary Judgment. Ordering Clker to reassign case to another district court judge to schedule matter for trial. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 5/17/11. (bsw)
December 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER denying 28 Motion to Compel Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 12/9/10. (gpb)
October 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER, sua sponte regarding discovery issues. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 10/26/10. (gpb)
October 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER re discovery dispute: the parties shall confer with each other as soon as practicable and attempt to resolve, or at least narrow, the contested discovery issues. The parties shall contact the undersigned's chambers by email, on or before Tuesday, October 19, 2010 at 5:00 p.m., and report with specificity the remaining areas of disputes, if any, and whether the parties seek a follow-up telephone conference regarding these discovery matters.Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 10/14/10. (gpb)
June 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 12 Motion to Dismiss Defendant's Counterclaims; denying 20 Motion to Disqualify Counsel. Motion #12 is granted in part as to the conversion and theft claims and denied in part as to the claims for breach of contract and civil liability. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 6/29/10. (gpb)
March 18, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting 6 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice, added Michael D. Kabat for Time Warner Entertainment Company, Limited Partnership. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 3/17/10. (gpb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reid-Lamb v. Time Warner Entertainment Company, Limited Partnership
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anne E. Reid-Lamb
Represented By: Jenny L. Sharpe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Time Warner Entertainment Company, Limited Partnership
Represented By: James Michael Honeycutt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?