Johnson v. Hendrick Automotive Group
Plaintiff: Raymond A. Johnson
Defendant: Hendrick Automotive Group
Case Number: 3:2010cv00109
Filed: March 11, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Charlotte Office
Presiding Judge: David Keesler
Presiding Judge: Frank D. Whitney
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 133 ORDER denying 125 Motion for Reconsideration; denying 129 Motion for Recusal; denying 131 Motion for Transcript. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 2/16/2012. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (tmg)
December 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 124 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 104 Motion for Reconsideration and 106 Motion for Reconsideration as set forth in order; denying 122 Motion for Reconsideration of costs taxed. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 12/5/2011. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(bsw)
September 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 119 ORDER denying 116 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 117 Amended Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 9/13/11. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(gpb)
August 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 115 ORDER denying 107 Motion for Transcript; denying 108 Motion for Hearing; granting 111 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney as to Shere K. Stewart. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 8/15/11. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(gpb)
May 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 105 ORDER resetting response deadline as to 104 MOTION for Reconsideration (construed as a Motion for Relief from Judgment) re 99 Order - responses due by 8/15/2011. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 5/17/11. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(com)
May 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 103 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Orders dated 5/3/11 and 5/17/2011. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(bsw)
May 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER: 80 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot; Defendants 89 Motion for Summary Judgment with respect to all of Plaintiffs claims is GRANTED, with respect to Defendant's counterclaim is GRANTED in part as to Plaintiff 's liability and to the extent that Defendant is entitled to damages in the amount of $20,000 and DENIED in part as to whether Defendant is entitled to further damages described herein. Defendant's Motion for Monetary Sanctions is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 5/3/2011. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (tmg)
February 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 95 ORDER denying 84 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 2/15/11. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(gpb)
February 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 94 ORDER and NOTICE re 89 MOTION for Summary Judgment. (Plaintiff's Response due by 3/16/2011. Motion Hearing set for 4/14/2011 02:00 PM in Courtroom 1, 401 W Trade St, Charlotte, NC 28202 before District Judge Frank D. Whitney.). Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 2/14/11. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(gpb)
February 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 88 ORDER Rescheduling Judicial Settlement Conference. ( Settlement Conference rescheduled for 2/23/2011 01:00 PM in Courtroom 1, 401 W Trade St, Charlotte, NC 28202 before Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer.). Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 2/1/11. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(gpb)
January 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER, ( Settlement Conference set for 2/8/2011 09:30 AM in Courtroom 3, 401 W Trade St, Charlotte, NC 28202 before Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer.). Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 1/25/11. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(gpb)
January 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER denying as moot 69 Motion for Judge Keesler to Wave's Fee's to be Paid to Depositions for Defendant's; denying as moot 74 Motion to Put Deposition on Hold Until Defendants Product Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 1/20/11. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(gpb)
January 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER denying Plaintiff's 66 and 67 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 1/18/2011. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (tmg)
January 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER granting 61 Motion to Quash. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 1/7/11. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(chh)
January 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER denying without prejudice 52 Motion to Compel; denying without prejudice 53 Motion to Compel; granting 54 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. ( Discovery due by 1/24/2011.). Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 1/6/11. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(gpb)
December 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER directing the parties to confer immediately to attempt to resolve their discovery disputes without further Court intervention and to schedule the remaining depositions in this matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 12/30/10. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(gpb)
December 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER scheduling ( Telephone Conference set for 12/30/2010 11:15 AM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge David Keesler.) Parties shall be prepared to discuss case status and discovery disputes. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 12/28/2010. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(bsw)
November 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER re: leave to file Amended Complaint, Order 41 . ( Amended Complaint due by 11/15/2010.). Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 11/3/10. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(gpb)
October 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER denying 33 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 10/12/10. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(gpb)
September 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER denying 27 Motion for Reconsideration. Defendant shall promptly file an Answer, and the Parties should immediately proceed to an Initial Attorney's Conference and submit the Certificate of Initial Attorney FRCvP 2 6(f) Conference Form in accordance with the applicable local rules and standing orders governing this case. The Court reserves ruling on the Motion to Amend Complaint 29 .. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 9/21/10. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(gpb)
September 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 13 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 9/10/10. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(gpb)
June 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER re 13 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, directing Plaintiff to file a Response not later than 7/12/2010. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 6/21/10. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(gpb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Hendrick Automotive Group
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raymond A. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hendrick Automotive Group
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?