Mitchell v. Loven et al
Plaintiff: Danita Mitchell
Defendant: Dean P. Loven, Lisa Bell, Felicia McAdoo and Daniel Bailey
Case Number: 3:2010cv00148
Filed: March 29, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Charlotte Office
Presiding Judge: David S. Cayer
Presiding Judge: Robert J. Conrad
Presiding Judge: Robert J. Conrad
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 33 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated October 8, 2010. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (tmg)
September 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 28 MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 17 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Felicia McAdoo, Daniel Bailey be granted, that 15 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Lisa Bell be granted, that 14 MOTION to Strike MOTION for Recusa l MOTION for New Trial filed by Danita Mitchell be denied, that 20 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Dean P. Loven be granted; and recommending that Complaint be DISMISSED for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction; ( Objections to M&R due by 9/20/2010), ORD ER denying as moot 11 MOTION to Amend/Correct 2 Complaint MOTION for Judicial Review Pursuant to Administrative Procedures Act and that all further proceedings in this action, including all discovery, are STAYED pending the District Judge's ruling on this Memorandum and Recommendation and Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 8/31/2010. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(cw)
May 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting 4 Motion for Reconsideration, application for IFP granted. Service of process to issue and be forwarded to USMS for service. Signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 5/12/2010. (cw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mitchell v. Loven et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danita Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dean P. Loven
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lisa Bell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Felicia McAdoo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Bailey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?