Smith v. Piedmont Natural Gas, Inc. et al
Olivia Smith |
Piedmont Natural Gas, Inc., Dorothy Latimer, Ron Nelson, Carlotta Chambers and Sandi Seivers |
3:2010cv00285 |
June 28, 2010 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Charlotte Office |
Mecklenburg |
David Keesler |
Robert J. Conrad |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 4/23/2012. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(bsw) |
Filing 34 ORDER (Status Report due by 3/12/2012); ex parte communication from Plaintiff to be filed under seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 3/5/2012. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (tmg) |
Filing 31 ORDER granting 29 Motion to Compel. Plaintiff shall fully respond to Defendant's discovery requests on or before 2/6/2012. Defendant PNG's request for attorneys' fees is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 1/23/2012. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (tmg) |
Filing 25 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 13 Piedmont Natural Gas's Motion to Dismiss - it is granted with respect to Plaintiff's ADEA claims but denied with respect to her ADA claims; granting 15 Motion to Dismiss as to Dorothy Latimer, Ron Nelson, Carlotta Chambers, and Sandi Sievers; adopting 24 Memorandum and Recommendations. Signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 4/8/2011. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (tmg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.