V-E2 v. Callbutton, LLC et al
Plaintiff: V-E2, LLC
Defendant: Callbutton, LLC and Michael Markette
Thirdparty_plaintiff: Callbutton, LLC
Thirdparty_defendant: David Leventhal
Case Number: 3:2010cv00538
Filed: October 26, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Charlotte Office
County: Mecklenburg
Presiding Judge: David S. Cayer
Presiding Judge: Richard Voorhees
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 27 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 1/24/2013. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(blf)
December 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 20 Motion for Summary Judgment. Michael Markette is dismissed from this action. Trial to be scheduled for February 2013. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 12/8/2012. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(blf)
December 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER granting 14 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time Scheduling Deadlines. ( Discovery due by 5/14/2012, Motions due by 6/12/2012, Mediation deadline set for 6/1/2012, Jury Trial set for 12/5/2012 09:30 AM in Courtroom 1, 401 W Trade St, Charlotte, NC 28202 before District Judge Max O. Cogburn Jr.),. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 12/16/2011. (bsw)
March 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER that counsel conduct the required IAC and file with the court the required CIAC not later than 3/31/2011. A $50 per side, per day penalty will be assessed starting 4/1/2011, if such filing is not made by such date. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 3/22/2011. (tmg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: V-E2 v. Callbutton, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: V-E2, LLC
Represented By: John Francis Hanzel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Callbutton, LLC
Represented By: C. Marshall Lindsay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Markette
Represented By: C. Marshall Lindsay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Thirdparty_plaintiff: Callbutton, LLC
Represented By: C. Marshall Lindsay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Thirdparty_defendant: David Leventhal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?