Yates v. Medical Specialties, Inc.
| C. Steven Yates |
| Medical Specialties, Inc. |
| Medical Specialties, Inc. |
| C. Steven Yates |
| 3:2011cv00006 |
| January 5, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| Mecklenburg |
| David S. Cayer |
| Frank D. Whitney |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
ORDER granting in the alternative 57 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 5/29/2013. (blf)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER denying 50 Motion for Clarification and Reconsideration of Claim Construction order. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 4/3/2013. (blf)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER regarding motions and briefs 28 29 32 33 34 36 and 42 .. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 12/17/2012. (blf)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER granting 44 Motion to seal and redact transcript. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 10/16/2012. (blf)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER, ( Markman Hearing set for 7/30/2012 02:00 PM in Courtroom, 401 W Trade St, Charlotte, NC 28202 before District Judge Max O. Cogburn Jr.) Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 5/29/2012. (blf)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER denying 9 Motion to Consolidate Cases. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 6/6/2011. (tmg)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER denying 7 Motion for Leave to Conduct Early Written Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 3/28/2011. (tmg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
