Jones v. Carron et al
| Thomas L. Jones |
| Martha H. Curran, David G. Manseau, R. Harcourt Fulton, Albert Diaz and Richard D. Boner |
| 3:2011cv00037 |
| January 21, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| Mecklenburg |
| Dennis Howell |
| Robert J. Conrad |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated September 21, 2011. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(gpb)
|
|
Filing
30
ROSEBORO ORDER. Plaintiff to respond to 20 MOTION to Dismiss and 17 MOTION to Dismiss by 4/15/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 4/5/11. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(com)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER granting 23 Motion Pursuant to LCVR 7.1(A); the court notes plaintiff's withdrawal of his previous comments. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 3/15/2011. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (tmg)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER denying without prejudice 14 Motion to Amend Complaint; denying 16 Motion to Amend and Clarify Complaint; striking 19 Motion pursuant to LCvR 7.1(A) and LCvR 5.2(C). Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 3/9/11. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(com)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER denying 15 Motion Opposing Reassignment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 3/1/11. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(gpb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
