Pond v. Primary Capital Advisors LC
Michael Pond |
Primary Capital Advisors LC |
3:2011cv00156 |
March 30, 2011 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Charlotte Office |
Mecklenburg |
David S. Cayer |
Robert J. Conrad |
Other Labor Litigation |
05 U.S.C. ยง 704 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 68 ORDER dismissing as Moot 60 Motion for Reconsideration filed by Primary Capital Advisors LC. Signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 3/12/12. (ssh) |
Filing 66 ORDER granting 65 Motion to Stay. All deadlines and proceedings are Stayed through 3/8/12. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 2/23/12. (com) |
Filing 59 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated February 8, 2012. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (tmg) |
Filing 56 ORDER to provide the Court with briefing on whether Pond, Lawrence, Smith and Mangus's acceptance of the Offer of Judgment is valid by 2/9/2012. Signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 2/2/2012. (tmg) |
Filing 37 ORDER granting 27 Motion to Quash Third-Party Subpoena to Envoy Mortgage. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 11/14/2011. (tmg) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting 9 , 10 , 11 Motions for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Deborah J. Livesay,Scott G. Blews,William A. Clineburg for Primary Capital Advisors LC. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 5/16/11. (bsw) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice, added Tracey F. George for Michael Pond. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 3/30/2011. (tmg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.