Outdoor Lighting Perspectives Franchising, Inc. v. Charrier et al
Plaintiff: Outdoor Lighting Perspectives Franchising, Inc.
Defendant: Home Amenities, Inc., Charrier Lighting Solutions, Tim Charrier and Janice Charrier
Case Number: 3:2011cv00567
Filed: November 9, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Charlotte Office
County: Mecklenburg
Presiding Judge: Graham Mullen
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 6/8/2012. (eef)
June 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER granting 39 Motion to Hold Defendants in Contempt. Defendants are order to pay Plaintiff the amount of $6,200. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 6/7/12. (com)
January 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 32 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, granting 14 Motion. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 1/18/2012. (tmg)
December 12, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER granting 22 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Justin M. Klein for Janice Charrier, Tim Charrier, Charrier Lighting Solutions, and Home Amenities, Inc. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 12/12/11. (com)
November 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER granting 13 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice, added Michael Robert Gray for Outdoor Lighting Perspectives Franchising, Inc. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 11/30/11. (gpb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Outdoor Lighting Perspectives Franchising, Inc. v. Charrier et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Home Amenities, Inc.
Represented By: Clifton Walker Homesley
Represented By: Clark Daniel Tew
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charrier Lighting Solutions
Represented By: Clifton Walker Homesley
Represented By: Clark Daniel Tew
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tim Charrier
Represented By: Clark Daniel Tew
Represented By: Clifton Walker Homesley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Janice Charrier
Represented By: Clifton Walker Homesley
Represented By: Clark Daniel Tew
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Outdoor Lighting Perspectives Franchising, Inc.
Represented By: Katie Miller Iams
Represented By: Michael Robert Gray
Represented By: William L. Esser, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?