Rubbermaid Incorporated et al v. Ergotron Inc

Plaintiff: Rubbermaid Incorporated
Defendant: Ergotron, Inc
Case Number: 3:2012cv00416
Filed: July 10, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Charlotte Office
County: Mecklenburg
Presiding Judge: David S. Cayer
Presiding Judge: Robert J. Conrad
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 28, 2014 Filing 48 ORDER that the Court hereby vacates its Claim Construction order issued on March 11, 2014. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 7/28/2014. (tmg)
June 25, 2014 Filing 45 ORDER granting 43 Joint MOTION for Vacatur of the Court's Claim Construction Order to Facilitate Settlement and Dismissal of this Action. The parties shall file with this Court within fourteen (14) days a stipulation of voluntary dismissal communicating that a final settlement has been reached as to all issues in this case. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 6/25/2014. (eef)
March 11, 2014 Filing 42 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER re 37 Patent Claim Construction Brief, 36 Memorandum, 40 Memorandum, 34 Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement, 35 Patent Claim Construction Brief. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 3/11/2014. (eef)
June 4, 2013 Filing 39 ORDER granting 38 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Andriana Shultz Daly for Rubbermaid Incorporated. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 6/3/2013. (blf)
February 11, 2013 Filing 31 ORDER granting 30 Motion for ESI order. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 2/8/2013. (blf)
November 26, 2012 Filing 22 ORDER granting 21 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Laura L. Myers for Ergotron, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 11/26/12. (bsw)
September 21, 2012 Filing 18 ORDER granting 16 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added David E. Finkelson,Derek H. Swanson for Rubbermaid Incorporated,David E. Finkelson,Derek H. Swanson for Rubbermaid Incorporated; granting 17 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added David E. Finkelson,Derek H. Swanson for Rubbermaid Incorporated,David E. Finkelson,Derek H. Swanson for Rubbermaid Incorporated. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 9/21/2012. (blf)
September 13, 2012 Filing 14 ORDER granting 12 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Kurt John Niederluecke,Grant D. Fairbairn for Ergotron, Inc,Kurt John Niederluecke,Grant D. Fairbairn for Ergotron, Inc; granting 13 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Kurt John Niederluecke,Grant D. Fairbairn for Ergotron, Inc,Kurt John Niederluecke,Grant D. Fairbairn for Ergotron, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 9/13/2012. (blf)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rubbermaid Incorporated et al v. Ergotron Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rubbermaid Incorporated
Represented By: Robert Ashley Muckenfuss
Represented By: Matt Pearson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ergotron, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?