Anderson v. Office Depot, Inc.
Deborah Anderson |
Office Depot, Inc. |
3:2012cv00560 |
August 28, 2012 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Charlotte Office |
Mecklenburg |
David S. Cayer |
Graham Mullen |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 29 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 10/18/2013. (blf) |
Filing 25 ORDER granting 23 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 6/25/2013. (blf) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Anderson v. Office Depot, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Office Depot, Inc. | |
Represented By: | C. Marshall Lindsay |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Deborah Anderson | |
Represented By: | William David Owens |
Represented By: | Kimberly Turner Miller |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.