Lee v. Nelly et al
Plaintiff: Curtis Lee
Defendant: Richard Nelly, Herbert Jackson, Sami Hassan and Carolina Bone and Joint Center
Case Number: 3:2012cv00562
Filed: August 29, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Charlotte Office
County: Mecklenburg
Presiding Judge: Robert J. Conrad
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 57 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 09/28/2015. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns on 09/28/2015. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(jlk)
January 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER re 40 MOTION for Summary Judgment , Plaintiff shall have thirty days from entry of this Order to file a response to Defendants motion for summary judgment 40 . Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 01/26/2015. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(jlk)
July 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER that Clerk shall issue a summons for Defendants Richard Nelly and Herbert Jackson to USM for Service; that the complaint against Defendants Dr. Sami Hassan and Carolina Bone and Joint Center is DISMISSED without prejudice; and that Plaintiffs 14 motion for copies at Government expense is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 7/28/2014. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (jde)
March 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER denying 10 Motion for Reconsideration re 9 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief. Signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 3/22/2013. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(blf)
February 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER denying 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 3 Motion to issue subpoena. Signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 2/20/2013. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(blf)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lee v. Nelly et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Curtis Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Nelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Herbert Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sami Hassan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolina Bone and Joint Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?