Danielson v. Human et al
| Aaron Keven Danielson |
| John Does 1-100, H-Power Americas, Inc., H-Power Worldwide, LLC, H-Power Energy Storage Technologies, Inc., Jan Petrus Human and Albertus Johannes Humjan |
| 3:2012cv00840 |
| December 14, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| Alexander |
| David S. Cayer |
| Frank D. Whitney |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated May 2, 2014. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (tmg)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER for plaintiff, if he so chooses may submit further evidence of damages to this Court no later than April 16, 2014 re 19 MOTION for Default Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 4/2/2014. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(eef)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER granting 26 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 2/26/2014. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(blf)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER denying 15 MOTION for Default Judgment. The Answer filed on June 7, 2013 (Doc. No. 7) is STRICKEN. The Case Management Order filed on August 14, 2013 (Doc. No. 12) is STAYED. The Corporate Defendants have thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to retain counsel.. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 10/21/2013. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(blf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
