Thomas v. State of North Carolina et al
Sharon T. Thomas |
Mecklenburg County Department of Human Resources, Mecklenburg County Public Library, Mecklenburg County of Mental Health, Mecklenburg County Government, Mecklenburg County Department of Social Services and State of North Carolina |
3:2013cv00001 |
January 2, 2013 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Charlotte Office |
Mecklenburg |
David Keesler |
Max O. Cogburn |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 5/10/2013. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(eef) |
Filing 28 ORDER denying without prejudice as moot 14 Motion to Dismiss; denying without prejudice as moot 17 Motion to Dismiss; affirming 22 Memorandum and Recommendations.. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 4/3/2013. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(eef) |
Filing 27 ORDER, Set Deadlines as to 23 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint.(Responses due by 4/8/2013). Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 3/22/13. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(bsw) |
Filing 16 ORDER denying as moot 2 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 5 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 8 Motion for Extension to submit; granting 11 Motion to Amend/Correct; affirming 12 Memorandum and Recommendations.. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 2/26/2013. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(chh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.