Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Mason et al
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant:
James Harvey Mason
Receiver:
Joseph W. Grier, III
Case Number:
3:2013cv00196
Filed:
March 27, 2013
Court:
North Carolina Western District Court
Office:
Charlotte Office
County:
Polk
Presiding Judge:
Graham Mullen
Nature of Suit:
Securities/Commodities
Cause of Action:
7:6(b) Federal Commodity Exchange Regulation
Jury Demanded By:
None
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
September 15, 2016 | 192 |
![]() |
September 8, 2016 | 188 |
![]() |
April 5, 2016 | 183 |
![]() |
November 20, 2015 | 173 |
![]() |
November 18, 2015 | 172 |
![]() |
July 7, 2015 | 168 |
![]() |
May 4, 2015 | 163 |
![]() |
April 23, 2015 | 161 |
![]() |
April 10, 2015 | 154 |
![]() |
December 30, 2014 | 138 |
![]() |
December 22, 2014 | 137 |
![]() |
November 19, 2014 | 118 |
![]() |
October 22, 2014 | 112 |
![]() |
October 14, 2014 | 107 |
![]() |
September 9, 2014 | 101 |
![]() |
September 3, 2014 | 95 |
![]() |
August 1, 2014 | 85 |
![]() |
July 31, 2014 | 83 |
![]() |
June 24, 2014 | 74 |
![]() |
April 8, 2014 | 66 |
![]() |
March 11, 2014 | 62 |
![]() |
January 23, 2014 | 57 |
![]() |
December 27, 2013 | 54 |
![]() |
December 18, 2013 | 52 |
![]() |
November 1, 2013 | 47 |
![]() |
September 19, 2013 | 44 |
![]() |
July 18, 2013 | 36 |
![]() |
July 2, 2013 | 33 |
![]() |
June 12, 2013 | 28 |
![]() |
May 22, 2013 | 23 |
![]() |
April 8, 2013 | 14 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.