Jenkins v. Gregg Appliances, Inc.

Plaintiff: Mal F. Jenkins
Defendant: Gregg Appliances, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2013cv00392
Filed: June 27, 2013
Court: North Carolina Western District Court
Office: Charlotte Office
County: Mecklenburg
Referring Judge: David S. Cayer
Presiding Judge: Robert J. Conrad
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 1, 2013 9 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 5 & 6 Motions for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Joseph Charles Pettygrove, Rozlyn Marie Fulgoni-Britton for Gregg Appliances, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 7/1/2013. (tmg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jenkins v. Gregg Appliances, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mal F. Jenkins
Represented By: Roscoe Cecil Hood, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gregg Appliances, Inc.
Represented By: Russ Ferguson
Represented By: Rozlyn Marie Fulgoni-Britton
Represented By: Joseph C. Pettygrove
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?