Pridgeon et al v. Pegram et al
John Does 1-100, L.I.G.Services, Inc. and Lee Ann Pridgeon |
Rick Ryan Pegram, Debra R. Pegram and John Does 1-10 |
3:2013cv00467 |
August 15, 2013 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Charlotte Office |
XX, Outside State |
David Keesler |
Frank D. Whitney |
Other Statutory Actions |
18 U.S.C. ยง 2511 Wiretapping |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 64 ORDER denying as moot 58 Motion to Quash; denying as moot 61 Motion to Compel; Further Ordered that the parties shall file a Stipulation of Dismissal in this case, or in the alternative request an extension of time to file such dismissal, on or before January 9, 2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 12/16/2014. (eef) |
Filing 54 ORDER denying as moot 41 Motion to Dismiss ; denying as moot 42 Motion to Strike ; denying 43 Motion to Strike. Parties are directed to conduct the IAC and file certification by Friday 5/16/14 so that scheduling order may be promptly entered in this case. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 5/13/14. (clc) |
Filing 52 ORDER sua sponte extending the time for Defendants to file an answer to Plaintiffs Amended Complaint re 40 , until 5:00 p.m. on Friday, April 11, 2014. If Defendants fail to file an answer, the Court will entertain a motion for entry of default. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 4/9/2014. (eef) |
Filing 44 ORDER denying 38 MOTION (Renewed) to Disqualify Counsel from Simultaneous Representation of Defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 9/27/2013. (eef) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.