Thomas v. The Right Choice MWM, Inc
Plaintiff: Ronald K. Thomas
Defendant: The Right Choice MWM, Inc
Case Number: 3:2013cv00512
Filed: September 13, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Charlotte Office
County: Mecklenburg
Presiding Judge: David S Cayer
Referring Judge: Frank D Whitney
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 28, 2015 Filing 32 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 04/28/2015. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns on 04/28/2015. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(jlk)
April 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER granting #28 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution, this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 04/28/2015. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(jlk)
April 23, 2015 Filing 30 Pro Se STATUS REPORT (Captioned as; Arbitration Dispute Ninety Day Report) by Ronald K. Thomas (eef)
April 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER Setting Response Deadline re: #28 Second MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution . Responses due by 4/20/2015. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 04/13/2015. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(jlk)
March 13, 2015 Filing 28 Second MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution by The Right Choice MWM, Inc. Responses due by 3/30/2015 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Hinnant, Charles)
January 26, 2015 Filing 27 STATUS REPORT by The Right Choice MWM, Inc (Hinnant, Charles)
January 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, Defendant is ORDERED to show cause why it has not submitted its third report on the progress of arbitration in this case in a timely manner. Additionally, the parties are ORDERED to submit any further status reports JOINTLY. Show Cause Response due by 1/30/2015. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 01/26/2015. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(jlk)
January 21, 2015 Filing 25 Pro Se STATUS REPORT by Ronald K. Thomas (eef)
October 21, 2014 Filing 24 STATUS REPORT by The Right Choice MWM, Inc (Hinnant, Charles)
October 21, 2014 Filing 23 STATUS REPORT in response to Order #19 filed 10/21/2014 by Ronald K. Thomas. (jlk)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER denying #21 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution; denying without prejudice Plaintiffs requests re #20 , to be raised before the arbitrator. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 7/29/2014. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(eef)
July 22, 2014 Filing 21 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution by The Right Choice MWM, Inc.Responses due by 8/8/2014 (Hinnant, Charles)
July 21, 2014 Filing 20 STATUS REPORT in response to Order #19 filed 04/23/2014 by Ronald K. Thomas. (jlk)
April 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER granting #8 Motion to Compel Arbitration; granting Defendant's alternative request for Stay pending arbitratioin; denying defendant's request for dismissal: Further Ordered that The parties are ORDERED to proceed to arbitration and submit reports to the Court every ninety (90) days. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 4/22/2014. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(eef)
April 11, 2014 Filing 18 RESPONSE in Support re #8 MOTION to Compel Arbitration or Alternativley to Stay by The Right Choice MWM, Inc. (Everage, Charles)
April 2, 2014 Filing 17 RESPONSE to Motion re #8 MOTION to Compel Arbitration or Alternativley to Stay by Ronald K. Thomas. Replies due by 4/14/2014 (jde)
March 19, 2014 Filing 16 Amended Corporate Disclosure Statement by The Right Choice MWM, Inc (Everage, Charles)
March 10, 2014 Filing 15 Corporate Disclosure Statement by The Right Choice MWM, Inc (Everage, Charles)
February 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #8 MOTION to Compel Arbitration or Alternativley to Stay. Responses due by 4/3/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 2/27/2014. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(tmg)
February 27, 2014 Filing 13 AMENDED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re: #8 MOTION to Compel Arbitration or Alternativley to Stay by Ronald K. Thomas. Responses due by 3/17/2014 (tmg). Motions referred to David S. Cayer.
February 26, 2014 Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re: #8 MOTION to Compel Arbitration or Alternativley to Stay by Ronald K. Thomas.Responses due by 3/17/2014 (tmg). Motions referred to David S. Cayer.
February 14, 2014 Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT in Support re #8 MOTION to Compel Arbitration or Alternativley to Stay by The Right Choice MWM, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Contractor Agreement, #2 Exhibit Job Description)(Everage, Charles)
February 13, 2014 Filing 10 Miscellaneous Filing by The Right Choice MWM, Inc. re: #9 Memorandum in Support of Motion Certification of Word Limitation (Everage, Charles)
February 12, 2014 Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Support re #8 MOTION to Compel Arbitration or Alternativley to Stay by The Right Choice MWM, Inc. (Everage, Charles)
February 12, 2014 Filing 8 MOTION to Compel Arbitration or Alternativley to Stay by The Right Choice MWM, Inc.Responses due by 3/3/2014 (Everage, Charles). Modified to remove referral on 4/8/2014 (jde).
January 23, 2014 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed The Right Choice MWM, Inc served on 1/16/2014, answer due 2/6/2014. (blf)
January 14, 2014 Filing 6 Summons Issued Conventionally to US Marshal for service as to The Right Choice MWM, Inc. (Attachments: #1 USM 285)(blf)
January 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 1/13/2014. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(blf)
September 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER denying #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 9/16/2013. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(blf)
September 13, 2013 Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Ronald K. Thomas. (blf). Motions referred to David S. Cayer.
September 13, 2013 Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ronald K. Thomas. (blf)
September 13, 2013 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Right Choice MWM, Inc, filed by Ronald K. Thomas. (Attachments: #1 summons)(blf)
September 13, 2013 Clerk's Entry and Service of #Case Assignment Packet. And #Initial Scheduling Order and Certificate of Initial Attorney FRCP 26(f) Conference Form pursuant to the Standing Order Governing Civil Case Management before the Honorable Frank D. Whitney (3:07-mc-47 (Doc. No. 2)). The document was served conventionally at case filing (blf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas v. The Right Choice MWM, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald K. Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Right Choice MWM, Inc
Represented By: Charles William Hinnant, III
Represented By: Charles A. Everage
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?