Emerald Performance Materials, LLC v. Recycling Solutions, LLC
Emerald Performance Materials, LLC |
Recycling Solutions, LLC |
3:2013cv00692 |
December 17, 2013 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Charlotte Office |
XX, Outside State |
David S. Cayer |
Max O. Cogburn |
Other Contract |
Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of Emerald Performance Materials, LLC against Recycling Solutions, LLC. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 5/28/2014. (eef) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Emerald Performance Materials, LLC v. Recycling Solutions, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Emerald Performance Materials, LLC | |
Represented By: | Bettie Kelley Sousa |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Recycling Solutions, LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.