Carolina Material Handling Services, Inc. v. Employee-Services.net, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Carolina Material Handling Services, Inc.
Defendant: Employee-Services.net, Inc., eePayrollservices, LLC, William S Staz, James W. Staz and Tina Staz
Case Number: 3:2014cv00127
Filed: March 21, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Charlotte Office
County: Mecklenburg
Presiding Judge: David Keesler
Presiding Judge: Frank D. Whitney
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 84 ORDER sua sponte that the parties file a joint status report within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 1/31/17. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mga)
January 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER STAYING CASE pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(a). Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 1/15/2015. (eef)
September 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER denying 70 Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 09/30/2014. (jlk)
May 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER Consolidating Cases for DiscoveryTrial. All further pleadings to be docketed to: 3:14-cv-00127. Member Cases: 3:14-cv-00135,3:14-cv-00144,3:14-cv-00155 to be administratively closed. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 5/9/2014. (eef)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carolina Material Handling Services, Inc. v. Employee-Services.net, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carolina Material Handling Services, Inc.
Represented By: William R. Terpening
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Employee-Services.net, Inc.
Represented By: Michael K. Elliott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: eePayrollservices, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William S Staz
Represented By: Michael K. Elliott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James W. Staz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tina Staz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?