Harper v. Lemon et al
| Michael S. Harper |
| Terry Lemon and FNU Whitley |
| 3:2014cv00182 |
| April 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| Mecklenburg |
| Frank D. Whitney |
| Civil Rights |
| Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
ORDER re 66 Order, ( Settlement Conference set for 10/11/2017 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2-2, 401 W Trade St, Charlotte, NC 28202 before Magistrate Judge David Keesler.) Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 9/13/17. (mga)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER That Judicial Settlement Conference in this matter shall be held on Wednesday, October 11, 2017. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 9/12/2017. (jaw)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER granting 62 Motion Requesting a Judicial Settlement Conference. The Court shall notify the parties of the date and time of the settlement in a separate order to follow. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 8/18/17. (mga)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 57 Motion for Discovery (To Reopen). Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 8/11/2017. (eef)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER before the Court on it's own Motion re: 1/8/2018 Jury Trial. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 7/6/2017. (eef)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER, ( Jury Trial Re-Set for 1/8/2018 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2-2, 401 W Trade St, Charlotte, NC 28202 before Senior Judge Graham Mullen.). Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 6/12/2017. (eef)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER granting appointment of counsel. Attorney John Fagg agreed to provide pro bono representation. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 2/13/17. (tob)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER denying 39 Motion for Summary Judgment ; denying 47 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 10/28/16. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mga)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER directing USMS to use reasonable efforts to locate and obtain service on Defendant Whitley. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 4/13/16. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER denying 33 Motion to Produce; denying 34 Motion to Compel; denying 35 Motion for preservation of evidencefor preservation of notes and tapes; denying 37 Motion for preservation of evidencefor preservation of notes and tapes. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 2/18/16. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER denying 30 Motion for Extension of Time ; denying 31 Motion for Disclosure; denying 32 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 2/10/16. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER denying 27 Motion for Discovery. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 10/26/15. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER on STATUS REVIEW. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 10/14/15. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(tob)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER denying as premature 22 Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Tangible Things; denying 23 Motion to Compel Interrogatories. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 09/01/2015. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(jlk)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDERED: This Court will allow Plaintiff to seek limited discovery, Plaintiff shall, therefore, have the right to submit a discovery request on the North Carolina Attorney General, If Plaintiff does not seek such discovery within 30 days of this Order, the Court will likely dismiss the action against Defendant FNU Whitley. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 08/19/2015. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(jlk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
