Underdue v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Felicia A. Underdue |
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Ila N. Patel, Kendra Brown and Susan Lybrand |
3:2014cv00183 |
April 14, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Charlotte Office |
Mecklenburg |
Robert J. Conrad |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 74 ORDER denying Plaintiff's 71 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 10/10/2019. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(brl) Modified signature date on 10/15/2019 (brl). |
Filing 62 ORDER granting 53 Pro Se MOTION for Extension of Time to Comply with 52 Order on Motion to Amend/Correct, Plaintiff to attach an amended complaint to her June 14, 2016 motion; denying 54 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 55 Motion to Remand. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 3/2/2018. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(eef) |
Filing 42 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 6/20/16. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns on 6/20/16. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mga) |
Filing 24 AMENDED ORDER denying 18 MOTION for Reconsideration re 16 Order on Motion to Dismiss/Failure to State a Claim. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 10/27/2014. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(eef) |
Filing 17 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 8/13/2014. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(eef) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.