Bridgetree Holdings, Inc. et al v. Roselli et al
Bridgetree Holdings, Inc. and Mark Beck |
Daniel Roselli, CustomerStream, Inc. and Jeff DeWald |
3:2014cv00448 |
August 18, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Charlotte Office |
Mecklenburg |
David S. Cayer |
Frank D. Whitney |
Other Contract |
Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 54 STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 7/9/2015. (tmg) |
Filing 42 ORDER Extending Deadlines (Discovery due by 5/4/2015, Expert Reports: Plaintiff's due by 3/6/2015 and Defendant's due by 4/3/2015). Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 2/9/2015. (tmg) |
Filing 33 ORDER granting 32 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Edward W. Gray, Jr for Mark Beck,Edward W. Gray, Jr for Mark Beck,Edward W. Gray, Jr for Bridgetree Holdings, Inc.,Edward W. Gray, Jr for Bridgetree Holdings, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 12/01/2014. (jlk) |
Filing 20 ORDER denying without prejudice and dismissing as moot 14 Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous; denying without prejudice and dismissing as moot 14 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 9/30/14. (clc) |
Filing 13 ORDER granting 11 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Craig V. Gabbert, for CustomerStream, Inc., Jeff DeWald; granting 12 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added D. Alexander Fardon for CustomerStream, Inc., Jeff DeWald. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 09/11/2014. (jlk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.