Industrial Piping, Inc. v. Zhang et al
Industrial Piping, Inc. |
Tao Zhang, Dayi Liu, Scott Paul, Tianwei New Energy Holdings Co., LTD and John/Jane Does |
3:2014cv00537 |
September 30, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Charlotte Office |
Mecklenburg |
David Keesler |
Robert J. Conrad |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 103 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated September 22, 2015. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (tmg) |
Filing 88 ORDER granting 86 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Michael O. Roe for Tianwei New Energy Holdings Co., LTD. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 03/24/2015. (jlk) |
Filing 54 ORDER denying 53 Motion to Consolidate Its Responses In Opposition To The Motions To Dismiss/Transfer Venue. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 02/20/2015. (jlk) |
Filing 17 ORDER granting 15 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Celeste K. Miller for Scott Paul. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 11/26/2014. (eef) |
Filing 13 ORDER granting 10 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Jack S. Gjording for Dayi Liu and Tao Zhang. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 11/24/2014. (eef) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting 4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Daniel J. Weber for Industrial Piping, Inc.. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 10/08/2014. (jlk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.