Bergquam v. iQor US Inc.
| Clayton Bergquam |
| iQor US Inc. |
| 3:2015cv00090 |
| February 26, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| Mecklenburg |
| David S. Cayer |
| Frank D. Whitney |
| Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 7703 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
ORDER denying as moot 6 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice to re-file a motion to dismiss in response to Plaintiffs Amended Complaint. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 05/06/2015. (jlk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bergquam v. iQor US Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Clayton Bergquam | |
| Represented By: | Todd J. Combs |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: iQor US Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Brandon M. Shelton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
