Steele v. Robinson et al
| Brandon Gerald Steele |
| FNU Robinson, FNU Diamond and FNU Henderson |
| 3:2015cv00252 |
| June 8, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| Mecklenburg |
| Frank D. Whitney |
| Civil Rights |
| Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 9/13/18. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER granting 34 Motion to Strike ; granting 36 Motion to Strike ; granting 31 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 9/15/17. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER re 42 USMS Return of Service. The U.S. Marshal is directed to file with the Courts docket its proof of service personally on Defendant Robinson before this Court may address Plaintiffs pending motion for default judg ment against Defendant Robinson. The Marshal may file the proof of service under seal or redacted if necessary to ensure confidentiality of Defendant Robinsons home address.Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 7/5/178. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER directing the U. S. Marshal to attempt personal service on Defendant Renesha Robinson personally or at her dwelling house or usual place of abode re 29 MOTION for Default Judgment as to, 28 Clerk's Entry of Default, 27 MOTION for Entry of Default.. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 5/11/17. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER within 30 days of this Order, the U.S. Marshal shall use reasonable efforts to locate and serve Defendant Renesha Robinson re 29 MOTION for Default Judgment and 27 MOTION for Entry of Default. If served defend ant has 30 days to respond. Document 28 Clerk's Entry of Default shall be set aside. The Clerk is respectfully instructed to mail a copy of this Order to the U.S. Marshal. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 3/6/17. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mga)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER that the U.S. Marshal shall use all reasonable efforts to locate and obtain personal service on Defendant Renisha Robinson at Defendants home address. If the U.S. Marshal is unable to obtain personal service on Defendant Robinson, the U.S. Marshal shall inform the Court of the reasonable attempts to obtain service. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 10/28/2016. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(eef)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER denying 17 , 18 Motions for Entry of Default. Defendant Robinson is no longer employed at Lanesboro Correctional and may not have received service of process, this Court will instruct the U.S. Marshal to use reasonab le efforts to locate and obtain service on Defendant Robinson at Robinson's home address. The address may be redacted from the summons forms for security purposes following service on Defendant. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 12/21/2015. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (tmg)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDERED re: Summons form for Defendant FNU Robinson, Plaintiff shall have twenty days in which to return the summons form to the Court for service on Defendant Robinson. If Plaintiff does not return the summons forms to the Co urt within the time period allotted, Plaintiffs claim against Robinson will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 08/19/2015. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(jlk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
