Wardlaw et al v. Arkin et al
Craig M. Wardlaw, Martha Ann Wardlaw, Richard B. Bates and Roger G. Hayes |
Robert Arkin and Sensiotec, Inc. |
3:2015cv00335 |
July 27, 2015 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Charlotte Office |
Mecklenburg |
David Keesler |
Frank D. Whitney |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 59 ORDER re 57 Order to Show Cause. Plaintiff's shall inform the Court of the identity of the purchaser of Sensiotec's assets with three days following the conclusion of the sale process. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 2/9/17. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc) |
Filing 51 ORDER denying 49 Notice of request for a status conference. Receivership established by the Court's prior Order (doc. 46) shall automatically terminate on September 4, 2016 at 5:00pm; The Amended Preliminary Injunction (doc. 28) and the Revised Preliminary Injunction (doc. 30) staying this case are TERMINATED. This case is scheduled for trial on the Court's January 2017 trial calendar. The administration of the remainder of this case shall be governed by the Amended Case Management Order entered herewith. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 8/2/2016. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(chh) |
Filing 46 ORDER appointing Matthew May of Atlanta to serve as a Receiver for Sensiotec pursuant to DGCL Section 291 until further order of this Court, but in no case for longer than six (6) months from the date of this Order. The stay of the case management deadlines and trial in this action is hereby continued until further order of the Court. The Receiver is directed to report the status of the case to the Court on or before August 1, 2016. This order shall remain in effect until further order of this Court or a final determination of this matter after a hearing on the merits. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 3/4/16. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mga) |
Filing 44 ORDER extending stay until close of business on Friday, March 4, 2016. Granting DCX_CHOL Enterprises motion to intervene and directing them to file a formal Complaint in this action no later than close of business on Friday, March 4, 2016. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 2/29/16. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc) |
Filing 40 ORDER granting with modification 35 Motion to Intervene. Hearing will take place on Monday, February 29, 2016 at 2pm in Courtroom #1. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 2/26/16. (clc) |
Filing 37 ORDER re 35 MOTION to Intervene Court will rule on this motion at 2/26/16 hearing. Briefs must be filed by 2/24/16.. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 2/22/16. (ssh) |
Filing 28 AMENDED PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION re: 26 "mutual consensual request", that the Preliminary Injunction in this matter be amended and revised as set forth below pursuant to a settlement agreement.. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 09/03/2015. (jlk) |
Filing 24 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER; This injunction was issued orally and its terms are effective as of August 14, 2015 at 4:58 pm. This Order shall remain in effect until further order of this Court or a final determination of this matter after a hearing on the merits. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 08/17/2015. (jlk) |
Filing 19 ORDER granting 14 Motion for "Protective Order To Permit Filing Of Affidavit Of Robert Arkin And Memorandum Of Law Under Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 08/06/2015. (jlk) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting 6 Motion to Seal Document. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 7/31/2015. (eef) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.