Pritchard et al v. Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut
| Iris K. Pritchard and Joseph P. Pritchard |
| Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford Connecticut |
| 3:2015cv00399 |
| August 28, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| Mecklenburg |
| David Keesler |
| Frank D. Whitney |
| Insurance |
| Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
ORDER denying 52 Motion to Withdraw ; adopting 58 Memorandum and Recommendations.. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 5/11/17. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)
|
|
Filing
59
CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 2/3/17. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns.(Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mga)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER denying without prejudice 24 Motion for Sanctions for Failure to Appear for Depositions. IT IS FURTHER Ordered that Plaintiff's "Motion for Protective as to Depositions" 28 is DENIED. Counsel for the parties shall confer and make reasonable arrangements for deposition testimony as directed herein, which shall be completed by September 30, 2016. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Motion for Protective Order as to Plaintiff's Exhibits 30 is GRANT ED. The Clerk of Court is directed to SEAL Document Nos. 28-1 and 28-2. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall be prepared to attend a Final Pretrial Conference on October 13, 2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 9/7/16. (mga)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
