Great Harvest Franchising, Inc. et al v. Panera Bread Company, Inc.
| Great Harvest Franchising, Inc., Charlotte's Best Breads, LLC and Our Daily Bread For Life, LLC |
| Panera Bread Company, Inc. |
| 3:2016cv00121 |
| March 10, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| Mecklenburg |
| Graham Mullen |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 44 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
ORDER granting 54 Joint Motion Entry of Order re 53 Stipulation to E-Discovery Procedures, and the Stipulation to E-Discovery Procedures (Dkt. 53) is incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth and entered. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 4/12/2017. (eef)
|
|
Filing
42
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 12/19/2016. (eef)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER denying as moot 11 Motion to Dismiss; denying 13 Motion to Change Venue. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 5/31/2016. (tmg)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER granting 20 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Jason M. Joyal for Panera Bread Company, Inc.. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 4/19/16. (tob)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER granting 6 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Casimir W. Cook, II for Charlotte's Best Breads, LLC,Casimir W. Cook, II for Great Harvest Franchising, Inc.,Casimir W. Cook, II for Our Daily Bread For Life, LLC. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 4/12/2016. (tmg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
