Montgomery v. Sam's West, Inc.
Plaintiff: Beth Montgomery
Defendant: Sam's West, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2016cv00356
Filed: June 15, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Charlotte Office
County: Gaston
Presiding Judge: Graham Mullen
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER Continuing July 30, 2018 Jury Trial re 51 Case Settlement Notice. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 7/9/2018. (jaw)
June 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 36 Motion in Limine; Denying 38 Motion in Limine; Denying 39 Daubert Motion. The parties shall appear before the Honorable Graham C. Mullen on June 19, 2018 for a Judicial Settlement Conference and the trial is re-set for July 30, 2018. (See order for further rulings)Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 6/15/2018. (jaw)
June 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER in re 36 MOTION in Limine , 38 MOTION in Limine , and 39 MOTION DAUBERT with Memorandum of Law. Responses to these Motions shall be filed no later than Friday, June 8, 2018. Replies shall be filed no later than Tuesday, June 12, 2018. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 6/6/2018. (jaw)
April 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER - Jury Trial Re-set for 6/18/2018 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2-2, 401 W Trade St, Charlotte, NC 28202 before Senior Judge Graham Mullen. The deadlines set in this Courts March 15, 2018 order (Doc. No. 27) for pre-trial matters is hereby re-set for May 21, 2018, at 4:00pm. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 4/23/2018. (jaw)
March 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER regarding trial set on Monday, May 14, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. in Charlotte, NC. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 3/15/2018. (jaw)
July 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER denying 18 Motion for Reconsideration re 17 Order on Motion for Two Independent Medical Exam. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 7/20/2017. (eef)
June 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER granting 16 Motion for Independent Medical Exam. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 6/15/2017. (chh)
November 21, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 11/21/2016. (eef)
October 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER (Jury Trial reset for 2/12/2018 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2-2, 401 W Trade St, Charlotte, NC 28202 before Senior Judge Graham Mullen). Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 10/26/2016. (tmg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Montgomery v. Sam's West, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Beth Montgomery
Represented By: Gary Stephen Hemric
Represented By: Jennifer Michelle Houti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sam's West, Inc.
Represented By: R. Scott Brown
Represented By: William John Cathcart, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?