Courtney v. Ikea U.S. East, LLC
| Davida Courtney |
| Ikea U.S. East, LLC, Ikea U.S. East, Inc, Ikea Property, Inc, Ikea Properties, Inc, Ikea Holding U.S., Inc and Ikea U.S. West, Inc |
| 3:2016cv00569 |
| July 22, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| Mecklenburg |
| David Keesler |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 11/29/17. (mga)
|
|
Filing
26
CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 10/27/17. (mga)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER granting 21 Motion to Lift Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 8/14/17. (tob)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER that the parties shall file a Status Report in this action within ten (10) days of a ruling by the Middle District on the pending motion to dismiss. ( Jury Trial set for 10/30/2017 09:30 AM in Magistrate Courtroom 1-3, 401 W Trade St, Charlotte, NC 28202 before Magistrate Judge David Keesler.) Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 5/8/17. (mga)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER denying without prejudice 17 Motion to Lift Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 2/3/17. (mga)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER granting 12 Motion to Stay and directing pltf. to file Status Report with this Court on or before 10/28/2016.. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 10/18/2016. (ttl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
