Citibank, N.A. v. Jackson
| Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and Carolina Water Systems, Inc. |
| George W. Jackson |
| George W. Jackson |
| Citibank, N.A. |
| 3:2016cv00712 |
| October 12, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| Mecklenburg |
| Graham Mullen |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
ORDER Denying 48 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 2/23/2018. (jaw)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER Granting Home Depots Motion for Stay of Remand Order Pending Appeal in re 45 Motion to Stay. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 10/10/2017. (jaw)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER granting 23 Motion to Remand, and this case is remanded to the Superior Court of Mecklenburg County; denying without prejudice 32 Motion to Dismiss ; denying without prejudice 11 Motion to Compel; denying withou t prejudice 11 Motion to Dismiss ; denying 14 Motion Realign the Parties; denying without prejudice 16 Motion to Dismiss ; denying without prejudice 17 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 3/21/2017. (eef)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER granting 21 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Janet R. Varnell for George W. Jackson. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 11/8/16. (tob)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER granting 9 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Jack G. Zurlini, Jr for Carolina Water Systems, Inc. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 10/28/2016. (tmg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
